a theory on evolution
Women like "Should I become a mother?" IRK me. My ruthless unsympathetic answer is NO, you should not.
My friend monachus and I were discussing the idea of a reality that issues a licence to breed. Initially I thought it a fascist notion, but I've since been considering it more ardently.
We are living in an age of extremes. Third world poverty, pending environmental catastrophe and an alarming overpopulation of the planet, to name a few. Surely it is only prudent that we overhaul the concept of procreation? The 'go forth and multiply' dictum just does not comply.
Why do people have babies again?
Most answers would no doubt mention love, and families. Though a commendable asset of being human, what if these emotional reckonings are also responsible for a great deal of evolutionary retardation for the species?
For example, let's talk about cats. I mean kittens are cute sure, but this has never motivated me to go and get one. As an adult, I have had no cravings to own a pet. Admittedly I could willingly have a dog one day, but this is in knowing that should I choose to do so, it will no doubt involve serious commitment. Er, anyway, I digress.
To return to females actively seeking motherhood, I don't fully understand the maternal longing to rear babies and having them because science makes it possible. Maybe it's an age thing, or a biological calling, and I'm just not there yet. But I am certain I don't want to have children purely because of a need to be loved, or a yearning to care for them. As a little girl, I was not the type who relished playing house and dressing up dolls were not really what made me happy.
If there is some truth to monachus surmising that society is 75% jackass and 25% reasonable, why should people have the right to litter the world with inferior offspring? And by such a controversial adjective, I am referring to the products of abysmal parenting. The ones who end up contributing zero productivity and enlightenment of the race, preoccupied with Jerry bloody Springer, tabloid news, reality shows, dramatic soap operas and seeking celebrity fame. Damaged goods germinating more fuckwits. The ones who piss and moan about their bad lot in life, and don't choose to change it and make it better. Do we really need to keep replenishing the supply of dysfunctional individuals and families?
We issue a licence to drive, a licence to get married, a licence to practice medicine, even a friggin licence for fishing... is it not logical that reproduction, the creation of all important life, should be in the realm of those qualified, skilled and vetted?
Alas. Owning a licence is no guarantee for anything. People make mistakes, the best laid plans go awry, and there are always exceptions to all the rules. Damn you chaos. Additionally, it's tricky deciding on criteria for what makes a good parent. Damn you subjectivity. Then there's that pursuit of happiness, however misleading it may be.
So perhaps I should listen to my brother who says I think too much. It's foolishly easy being harsh in writing and blogging is an indulgence. I guess I should get drunk. Or get laid. Or both. Or not read the incendiary drivel of stupid people.
I still don't get the pressure to seek out a man plus kids to equal fulfillment in life. I'm also not against weakness. I just don't like wishy washy people and defeatist attitudes.
Maybe I want to rule the world. The survival of the fittest right? If I am deemed unworthy, well, bollocks. I'd be gutted.
Gah. Enough. More alcohol. Or a lobotomy please.




cool post! hehe same thoughts here! wouldn't want another miel plaguing society; joke lang! My point of view is i'm being selfish and there are a lot of things i want to do. As of the moment being a parent is not in vocabulary yet. Sure maybe when i reach a certain age (30's), perspective may change and who knows the realization to breed. Bottomline, take it easy, enjoy life, get drunk, compete, take risks and settle down when you're freakin 60 hehehe!
Posted by: Miel | Friday, 05 September 2008 at 07:53
gugustuhin mo ring magka-anak someday. and you will... hehehe :)
Posted by: nikulas | Friday, 05 September 2008 at 07:59
I love the entry. I believe that kids are a gift, as much as special people are gifts to us too. Personally, I'd say that if you want kids, go for it. If you don't then, maybe it's not yet time, you won't be emotionally and physically ready for the role of being a parent. You know? :)
I disagree with the lady in the article: Having kids, getting married, and settling down doesn't define a person. Someone who is unsettled alone and single will never be complete with kids or a spouse unless she is settled and content in herself, who she is, and her place in this world. For someone like me -- married and preparing myself physically and emotionally for children -- I know that completion is not in fitting into a social mold of what you ought to be. It's in living your purpose, wherever it is you are in life.
Oh, and by the way, I agree about the cat-dog situation. Cute, yes, but not enough to tempt me to adopt one. Too much responsibility!
Posted by: martsy | Friday, 05 September 2008 at 08:15
Here's the thing. I think that we humans haven't really adapted many of our habits to the way the world is now. I'm not saying all the traditions are defunct. I'm only proposing that perhaps we need to be more updated/upgraded about what we're doing.
We're living longer. There is no shortage of children in need of parenting, from adoption to foster homes, and the age old what is the meaning of life is an ongoing process. Why should we lead template lives?!
If I'll want to have kids, it will be in the desperate Utopian desire that they will make the world a better place than I ever did. But in that case, why do I need to have my own. I could also just teach others.
It's not that I don't want responsibility. Hardly. It's just understanding that the creation of life is more than sperm + egg and cute little pink frilly socks, and Johnson&Johnson TLC. Babies should certainly NOT be an accessory or supplement in someone else's life.
I do believe that children are the future, and they are indeed a great gift. They are the hope of the planet. Which is why I think society should seriously invest in them more, and ensure they are brought into this world properly, with more substantial and enterprising concern!
Posted by: eevilmidget | Friday, 05 September 2008 at 08:30
I love how in the sexist, archaic, bibliform cartoon, Eve is always the fuckup.
Posted by: blarmey | Saturday, 06 September 2008 at 11:13
Here's my input. I'm a firm believer in the fact that life throws you a shit load of curve balls. No matter how much we'd like to be in control of our destiny, shit will happen. No doubt about it. In this case, having a licence to have kids is just ludicrous. Just because one passes ones driving test doesn't mean one won't have an accident. You live you learn. However I completely agree that a baby is not an accessory, which I do think only a minority of people use that as a reason. Personally I think an unexplainable bond is made between child and mother during those 9 months, hence most parents I think (I may be wrong) naturally would want only the best for their kids.
On the subject of adoption; I think it's a very noble act. But nothing replaces knowing your bloodline lives on. (again other people may have different views. Besides i wouldn't miss out on the act of procreation. But when I'm ready. Right now I'm with Pahati, get drunk, enjoy my 20's, risks are unavoidable in life so I'll take what life throws at me. "How is it that some people sit in the sun looking like sour apples, and there are those that whistle in the rain." I AM A RAIN WHISTLER. And on that note: Rina you do think way too much.
Posted by: big bro | Sunday, 07 September 2008 at 00:57